Wednesday, 27 November 2013

Globe 24/7: The family put up 502,165 flickering Christmas bulbs {family-claim-Guinness-world-record-for-Christmas-light-display}



An Australian family who put more than half a million Christmas lights on their house has claimed a world record - for the second time. Father-of-three David Richards from Canberra first won the title in 2011 with 331,038 lights, but was beaten by a family in New York who put up 346,283. His family vowed to take regain the title this Christmas - so installed more than 31 miles of wire with 502,165 lights, glowing reindeer and loud music around their suburban home, to the irritation of some neighbors.


The sight has attracted neighbours from miles around - although not all of them are impressed. Some have not spoken to the family since 2011. Mr Richards, who lives in the suburb of Forrest with his wife Janean, son Aidan, 13, and daughters Caitlin, ten, and Madelyn, six, insisted most neighbors supported the display. He added: 'I have always loved Christmas. Having the Christmas lights with the community coming in and sharing it is a time when you get to know people you probably should know better, I guess.' Guinness World Records today confirmed the family's charity feat has officially the most Christmas lights on a residential property. The twinkling bulbs will cost about £1,400 to run for a month - but the sum has been donated by a local power company. The stunt is open to the public, and hundreds of people have already visited and posted videos on YouTube  It will raise funds for children's charities including to fight Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Up to 70,000 people visited the light show when he last put it on in 2011 and it raised £44,000 for charity. This year Mr Richards said he wants to raise £56,000. He told the Canberra Times: 'It actually helps a lot of families who have put up with an amazing amount of grief. That makes it all worthwhile to me. Asked what it feels like to walk into the light, he said that 'It's like a party in your driveway every night.'


Tuesday, 26 November 2013

Globe 24/7: Pope Francis Denounces ‘Idolatry of Money’ And ‘Tyranny’ of Capitalism


 Pope Francis, who has made alleviating poverty a central pillar of his papacy, criticized the “idolatry of money” in the global economy and denounced the unfettered free market as the “new tyranny.”
“How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses 2 points?” Pope Francis asked in an anticipated 84-page report airing the views of the Vatican, known as the apostolic exhortation and released Tuesday.
The report aligns with — and in some cases goes further than — the Pope’s progressive and reformist positions since he was elected in March. The pontiff criticizes the unequal distribution of wealth and calls for greater action to help the poor.
“I beg the Lord to grant us more politicians who are genuinely disturbed by the state of society, the people, the lives of the poor,” he writes.
.....Amen


Globe 24/7: Obama takes on critics of Iran deal, praises diplomacy

U.S. President Barack Obama participates in an event on immigration reform in San Francsico, November 25, 2013. REUTERS/Jason Reed



Iran on Monday by saying their tough talk was good for politics but not for U.S. security.
Top Republicans - as well as U.S. ally Israel - have criticized Obama for agreeing to the deal and some Democrats, who tend to more hawkish about Iran than Obama's administration, have been skeptical about it.
A number of lawmakers, especially Republicans, insisted they would try to enact stiffer new sanctions despite the deal, which the United States and its partners say may ultimately prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear bomb.
Obama, who has long been upbraided for his desire to engage with U.S. foes, took heat as a presidential candidate in 2008 for saying he would talk to Iran, which has not had diplomatic relations with Washington for more than three decades.
On Monday, however, he alluded to those foreign policy goals during remarks that were otherwise focused on immigration reform. He said he had ended the war in Iraq and would end the war in Afghanistan next year, two things he pledged to do as a candidate.
"When I first ran for president I said it was time for a new era of American leadership in the world, one that turned the page on a decade of war and began a new era of our engagement with the world," he said during a visit to San Francisco.
"As president and as commander in chief, I've done what I said."
Though the agreement forged by six major powers and Iran over the weekend is a first step, aimed at buying time to negotiate a comprehensive deal, the White House sees it as a form of vindication for policies that Obama has long espoused.
Under the interim deal, Iran will accept restrictions on its nuclear program in exchange for limited relief from economic sanctions that have gradually crippled its economy and slashed its oil exports.
It was widely praised in Iran and the region.
Israel, however, has argued that a partial deal is a bad deal and that easing sanctions, even temporarily, decreases the leverage that the United States and others have over Iran.
Obama said that if Tehran follows through on its part of the pact, it would chip away at years of mistrust between the two countries. To his critics, Obama was especially direct.
"Huge challenges remain, but we cannot close the door on diplomacy, and we cannot rule out peaceful solutions to the world's problems. We cannot commit ourselves to an endless cycle of conflict," he said.
"Tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically, but it's not the right thing for our security."
SKEPTICISM IN CONGRESS
Obama is in the middle of a three-day western swing to raise money for the Democratic Party while promoting his policy priorities on the economy. The Iran deal could be exploited politically by Republicans to garner money, and votes, from Israel supporters who view it as a threat to the Jewish state.
Pro-Israel lobbyists had been pushing American lawmakers hard to keep to a tough line on Tehran. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee issued a memo to supporters on Monday raising doubts about many terms of the interim agreement, including that it allowsIran to continue uranium enrichment.
But the pro-Israel advocacy group did not call for new sanctions to be imposed right away. AIPAC said it supported legislation that would allow sanctions to take effect if Iran violates the interim pact or a comprehensive deal falls through.
The White House - and the Iranian government - have said Congress could kill the deal if it enacts new sanctions now.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said on Monday the Senate will consider legislation next month to impose tighter sanctions on Iran, but only after studying the issue and possibly holding hearings.
"They will study this, they will hold hearings if necessary, and if we need work on this, if we need stronger sanctions, I am sure we will do that," Reid said on National Public Radio.
Comments from Reid and other lawmakers bolstered expectations that the Senate would likely hold off on imposing new sanctions for the next six months as negotiations continue.
Obama, at a fundraiser later in Los Angeles, said all options remained on the table for dealing with Iran. But he noted poignantly that his frequent visits to the Walter Reed military medical center where wounded service men and women are treated had influenced his push for diplomacy.
"I spend too much time at Walter Reed looking at kids - 22, 23, 24, 25 years old - who've paid the kind of price that very few of us in this room can imagine on behalf of our freedom, not to say that I'm going to do every single thing that I can to try to resolve these issues without resorting to military conflict," he said.

Globe 24/7: First watch: Afghanistan jeopardy, Radel resignation pressure, Health care deadline looms


 
Soldiers stand guard in Kabul, Afghanistan, on Nov. 14, 2013. A loya jirga, or grand council, will gather on Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013, to discuss a security deal with the United States.
All U.S. troops may leave Afghanistan in 2014, as President Hamid Karzai continues requesting changes to an all-but-signed agreement that would maintain an American presence through 2024. National Security Adviser Susan Rice met with Karzai Monday in Afghanistan, and warned him that new demands for prisoner releases and peace talks would not be met.
The Florida GOP is asking U.S. Rep. Trey Radel to resign while he undergoes treatment following cocaine charges. Radel went on indefinite leave last week and plans to donate his salary to charity. His House colleagues had previously said they would support his district during his absence.
The Obama administration says its HealthCare.gov website will be running properly by this weekend's deadline of Nov. 30. "Our bottom line is that we’ve made measurable progress in getting the site working smoothly for the vast majority of users," said consultant Jeffrey Zientz.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/11/26/3780459/first-watch-afghanistan-jeopardy.html#storylink=cpy

Globe 24/7: Anambra: It’s time to end electoral impunity in Nigeria


It is said that when bad things happen, it provides a chance for good people to make things better!
The mess that has been made of the Anambra election by the same body saddled with ensuring that it is free and fair is indeed a bad thing.
While the Anambra debacle, in which INEC apparently acted out a script written by the presidency and the PDP, represents a new low in the country’s unenviable saga of electoral impropriety, it must now signal the death knell for electoral malfeasance and brigandage in Nigeria.
Make no mistake about it: If something drastic but lawful is not done now to stop this electoral impunity, our country is ultimately heading for the precipice. This is not about crying wolf where none exists. The wolf is here and ready to pounce. Our challenge is to stop it before it is too late.

File photo: Chief Akande, right, General Buhari  at a meeting in Abuja

As things stand,. we have a dangerous admixture of Power and Impunity, and the end product cannot but be explosive.
We have a presidency that has no qualms about abusing national institutions to achieve a pre-set electoral objective, which is to humiliate a growing opposition party; A ruling party that is ever willing to sacrifice its own candidate in elections just to get at the opposition and a conniving electoral body that is packed full with saboteurs and blatantly amoral individuals.
To be sure, our party was not caught unawares. Ahead of the Anambra election, we issued a total of 15 press releases warning against everything that eventually happened at the elections. We said INEC was working in cahoots with the presidency/PDP to rig the elections; We exposed the rigging strategies that included mass disenfranchisement, starving of opposition strongholds of electoral materials and the late delivery of voting materials; We raised the alarm on the sudden creation of 1,973 voting units, for which our agents got no tags; We criticized the 22-hour curfew, because we believed it was a ploy to give the riggers the leeway to carry out their plans without being noticed and we warned that the results will not be acceptable without voting in all local governments.
“We have a presidency that has no qualms about abusing national institutions to achieve a pre-set electoral objective, which is to humiliate a growing opposition party; A ruling party that is ever willing to sacrifice its own candidate in elections just to get at the opposition and a conniving electoral body that is packed full with saboteurs and blatantly amoral individuals.”
Sadly, all our warnings proved prescient.
Before we begin our deliberations on how to resolve this recurring issue of electoral impunity, let me sound a note of warning:
1. If those who manipulated Anambra election, and the Delta Central Senatorial District before it, are allowed to get away with their shenanigans, they will be further emboldened to ply their devilish trade in Osun and Ekiti next year, and of course we can forget about the 2015 general elections.
2. The issues at stake go beyond Anambra State. They have the potential to affect the whole of Nigeria, with dangerous consequences for our young democracy.
And history should be our guide. This is exactly how the First Republic unraveled! A power-drunk central government seized on what is purely an intra-party affair in the then Action Group in its desperation to humiliate and decimate the opposition. The consequences of that decimation led to the first military coup….and Nigeria has yet to recover from it. The nation cannot afford a repeat!
The Anambra election has been seized upon by an increasingly desperate presidency/PDP to seek to humiliate our party and portray us as lacking in electoral value. That is why an unconscionable PDP spokesman raced to the media to hail the ill-fated election to the high heavens, even when the PDP candidate and some members of his family were among the thousands who were disenfranchised and marooned.
That is why the presidency has maintained a loud silence, because it was never interested in a PDP victory or a free and fair election, having made a devil’s deal to work against its own party just to get at the APC.
“And history should be our guide. This is exactly how the First Republic unraveled! A power-drunk central government seized on what is purely an intra-party affair in the then Action Group in its desperation to humiliate and decimate the opposition. The consequences of that decimation led to the first military coup….and Nigeria has yet to recover from it. The nation cannot afford a repeat!”
In the end, the devilish duo of the presidency and the PDP abandoned their own candidate and threw caution to the wind, without caring about the implication of their bizarre action. They discountenanced the opinion of their own candidate, who condemned the sham election and joined with other candidates to call for fresh elections. They celebrated as if their party is APGA even as their candidate was left stranded. This is an eye opener, and should end any doubt about the presidency and the PDP’s road-map for future elections.
Let me also use this opportunity to re-state our party’s stand, as contained in our Nov. 18th petition to the Chairman of INEC, Prof. Attahiru Jega: Only a fresh election based on a new voters’ register can correct the litany of grave flaws that ruined the elections. Nothing else is acceptable to us for the reasons we have repeated over and over again.
For the avoidance of doubt, we say, for the umpteenth time that there were serious irregularities and non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended; That INEC Chairman Jega himself acknowledged these irregularities, when he said an official of the commission compromised the election in Idemili North LG, a stronghold of our candidate, Dr. Chris Ngige; That the voters’ register used for the election was so tainted that many voters, especially in Senator Ngige’s stronghold, were disenfranchised; That students were recruited as Presiding Officers and Polling Assistants, further compromising the electoral process; That the staff of Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK), Awka, were recruited as Supervisory Presiding Officers (SPOs), contrary to INEC’s directive that staff of UNIZIK would not be used in the election since the APGA Deputy Governorship Candidate, Dr. Nkem Okeke, was a Senior Lecturer with the university prior to his candidacy; That election materials were not distributed in a timely manner in many polling units, thus affecting the timely commencement of accreditation and voting; That INEC failed to deploy election officials in sufficient numbers to several polling units, and election officials were recruited at the election venue and deployed without any form of training; And that results were brought in without being publicly announced by the LGA Collation Officers.
These are just some of the grave flaws that sealed the fate of the election
In conclusion, there is no doubt that our party has totally lost confidence in the ability and capability of INEC to organize a free, fair and transparent election anywhere in Nigeria.
We will not participate in any election until there is a far-reaching restructuring of INEC that will see a purge of the bad eggs in the commission, a re-orientation of the remaining staffers and the compilation of a new and credible voters’ register.
The restructuring of INEC and the compilation of a new voters’ register are the barest minimum requirements for Nigeria’s return to the path of electoral chastity.
We have no iota of confidence in INEC’s personnel and the commission’s voters’ register, which we believe has been irredeemably tampered with to such an extent that it can no longer be relied upon for any election.
We will not participate in any election until there is a far-reaching restructuring of INEC that will see a purge of the bad eggs in the commission, a re-orientation of the remaining staffers and the compilation of a new and credible voters’ register.
The restructuring of INEC and the compilation of a new voters’ register are the barest minimum requirements for Nigeria’s return to the path of electoral chastity.

.....Home for all

Globe 24/7: Central African Republic: France Sending 1,000 Troops to Central African Republic


France is sending about 1,000 extra troops to the Central African Republic to help support African peacekeepers in trying to return order to the country. French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said on Tuesday the additional troops will deploy for about six months.
France currently has about 400 soldiers based in the C.A.R.'s capital, Bangui. The overall peacekeeping force has about 2,500 of a planned total of 3,500 troops already in the country. The African Union will take over responsibility next month for the mission, which has been tasked with protecting civilians and restoring the central government's authority.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon laid out a range of options for the international community to support the country, including a proposal to convert the A.U. force into a U.N. peacekeeping mission.
Ban said in a report earlier this month that the C.A.R. lacks a national authority able to guarantee the security of the state or of its people.
The conflict has displaced 400,000 people internally and created a humanitarian situation that Ban said has affected all of the 4.6 million people living in the C.A.R.
The situation in the Central African Republic has been chaotic since March, when rebels overthrew President Francois Bozize. The transitional government has been unable to control the former rebels or keep Muslim and Christian groups from fighting each other.
The Central African Republic has endured a long series of coups and rebellions since gaining independence from France in 1960.

Globe 24/7: SPORT - Adamu names 20 Eagles for Copa Lagos


Head coach of Nigeria's Supersand Eagles, Audu Adamu has released to supersport.com the names of the 20 players that will vie for places in this year's squad to the Copa Lagos Beach Soccer championship.

This year's competition will take place at the Eko Atlantic City in Lagos from December 13 to 15 and the Nigerian team are the defending champions after winning the first two editions.
Veteran midfielder, Isiaka Olawale who has lifted the trophy twice retains his position as Nigeria's Beach Eagles' captain.

Adamu has also invited Kano Pillars first-choice goalkeeper, Joel Theophilus who is now expected to face serious competition from Abdul Isah and Oladapo Olalekan.
ABS defender, Omotayo Ibrahim will also taste the flavour of this competition for the very first time in his football career.

Experienced striker, Victor Tale, who single-handedly masterminded the condemnation of Portugal last year, will lead the Eagles attack with Abutu Adofu and Rotimi Omoniwa who will also be campaigning for the first time in this championship.

Adamu told supersport.com that all the 20 players that have been invited for this year's showpiece will camp at the Fifa Goal Project in Abuja from Wednesday November 27 to December 10.
“The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) are solidly behind us as they want us to succeed again this year and we would make all Nigerians happy next month in Lagos,” Adamu said to supersport.com
Meanwhile, Senegal, Lebanon and Germany are the other three nations that will participate in this year's showpiece in Lagos.

THE NIGERIAN SQUAD
Goalkeepers: Abdul Isah (Kaduna United), Oladapo Olalekan (Owibesed FC) Joel Theophilus (Kano Pillars).

Defenders: Okemmiri Ogbonaya (Abia Warriors) Emmanuel Onweferia (Owibesed FC) Ayobami Asekumowo (Wikki Tourists, Bauchi) Omotayo Ibrahim (ABS FC) Daniel Adu (Atete FC, Warri)
Midfielders: Isiaka Olawale (Dolphins FC) Ikechukwu Ibenegbu (Heartland) Suleiman Abubakar (Nasarawa Beach team) Badmus Babatunde (Owibesed FC) Emma Elemobor (Siasia FC Academy) Tayi Abdulrahman (FCT Beach team) Emeka Ogbonna (Kogi Beach team).
Strikers: Victor Tale (Shenne FC) Abu Azeez (Kwara United) Abutu Adofu (NYSC FC, Enugu) Rotimi Omoniwa (Nembe City) Nekan Nzeako (El-Kanemi-Warriors).

Globe 24/7: South African Bonds Climb With Rand as Growth Misses Estimate


South African bonds advanced after third-quarter economic growth fell short of economists’ estimates, fueling speculation borrowing costs will be kept at a four-decade low. The rand strengthened.
Gross domestic product rose an annualized 0.7 percent, compared with a revised 3.2 percent in the three months through June, Statistics South Africa said in a report released in Johannesburg today. The median estimate of 19 economists in a Bloomberg survey was 1 percent. The central bank left its key rate unchanged on Nov. 21, though Governor Gill Marcus said policy makers considered an increase on inflation concerns.
“We continue to expect no interest-rate hikes this year or next,” Annabel Bishop, an economist with Investec Ltd. in Johannesburg, said in e-mailed comments. “The Reserve Bank is currently overly hawkish in its communications given the marked weakness of economic growth.”
Yields on government bonds due February 2023 slid three basis points, or 0.03 percentage point, to 7.87 percent by 12:52 p.m. in Johannesburg. The rand appreciated 0.2 percent to 10.0815 per dollar.

Gbloe 24/7: NLC kicks against hike on duties payable on imported vehicles


The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), on Monday, kicked against the increase on duties and tariffs payable on imported vehicles as from next year and took a swipe at the Federal Government for raising the tariffs without providing a viable alternative.
NLC President, Comrade Abdulwahed Omar, who was speaking in Kaduna at the ongoing NLC 12th Harmattan School, berated the Federal  Government for “its notorious penchant to initiate policies  capable of inflicting pains on the working people in the country.”
The Coordinating Minister of the Economy and Finance Minister, Dr Ngozi Okonjo Iweala, recently came out with the new tariffs on imported vehicles which raised the charges by about 70 per cent effective from January 2014.
The NLC president lamented the rate of official graft under the present administration and declared that the announcement of the new tariffs barely few weeks to the commencement of implementation further confirmed people’s fear that the minister was merely implementing IMF programme in the country.
He pointed out that raising tariffs without providing an alternative would merely expose and put Nigerian people at the mercies of unscrupulous car dealers who would exploit the situation to create artificial scarcity with its attendant effects on transportation.
 Omar said: “It is lamentable that the Federal Government has again come up with a programme that has the tendency to inflict pains on the working people in Nigeria. We were told that Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance has announced a new tariff regime that raises the charges on imported vehicles by 70 per cent.
“While NLC is not opposed to the new policy, we hold that coming up with a new tariff barely few weeks to its implementation without viable alternative is not proper. In the least, it would just leave Nigerian people under the grips of some unscrupulous dealers who would lash on the new tariff to create artificial scarcity.”



Globe 24/7: Syria peace talks set for January 22 in Geneva

GENEVA (Reuters) - An international peace conference for Syria will begin on January 22, the first direct talks between President Bashar al-Assad's government and rebels seeking to overthrow him, the United Nations said on Monday.

Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. secretary-general, said the goal was to agree on a mutually acceptable transitional administration as well as the other elements of an outline peace plan drafted by the Western powers and Russia at Geneva in June last year.

"It is a huge opportunity for peace that shouldn't be wasted," Lakhdar Brahimi, Ban's special envoy for Syria, told a news conference in the Swiss city, where the long delayed face-to-face talks should take place in eight weeks.

Syrians and diplomats have few illusions about how hard it will be to end a civil war that has killed over 100,000 people since 2011, driven over a third of the population from their homes and divided the country among rival and often religiously driven factions with an array of competing foreign sponsors.

But a day after Assad's regional ally Iran cut a deal on its nuclear programme with the United States and other world powers to ease fears of a wider war in the Middle East, U.N. officials spoke of a chance to start staunching the bloodshed.

It remained unclear whether Iran would attend - nor is it clear who will represent the divided Syrian opposition - although U.S. officials raised doubts about Tehran's participation.

"There are many challenges ahead and no one should underestimate the difficulties," said a spokesman for U.S. President Barack Obama as he welcomed a date for the talks.

"The United States has long made clear that there is no military solution to the violence in Syria," he added.

Russia, a vital supplier to Syria, which has shielded Assad from Western demands for U.N. sanctions and from rebel demands that he step down before negotiations can start, again blamed the opposition for holding up the peace conference.

"It could have been held much earlier if the opposition had felt responsibility for its country and had not put forward preconditions when we met in September, October, November," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted as saying by state-run Russian news agency RIA.

'EYES WIDE OPEN'

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, fresh from a weekend working with Lavrov on the Iran nuclear deal at Geneva, said in a statement, "We are well aware that the obstacles on the road to a political solution are many, and we will enter the Geneva conference on Syria with our eyes wide open."

After so much blood has been spilled since demonstrations for democracy began during the Arab Spring, many on either side of Syria's divide see only outright victory guaranteeing their own survival. But neither side has delivered a knockout blow, giving mediators a chance to argue for compromise.

The deep engagement of neighbouring powers in the conflict, notably Shi'ite Iran behind Assad and Sunni Saudi Arabia behind the rebels, has also complicated efforts to defuse it.

Kerry and Brahimi said the presence of Iranian officials at the Syria conference - something Moscow supports and Washington has so far opposed - was yet to be decided.

But U.S. officials said Washington's position remained that Iran should not attend because it has not signed on to the "Geneva 1" framework. One of its core elements is that a future Syrian government must be formed by "mutual consent" of the authorities and the opposition, a stance the United States says means Assad cannot stay in power.

"We will continue to work in concert with the U.N. and our partners on remaining issues, including which countries will be invited to attend and what the agenda will be," Kerry said.

For Western governments, Iran's reluctance to endorse last year's international accord on Syria has been a bar to its attendance at talks widely referred to as "Geneva 2".

Ban described the aim of the new summit as the "full implementation of the Geneva communique of 30 June, 2012".

A spokeswoman for the British Foreign Office said, "Until Iran publicly endorses the Geneva communique, and therefore makes clear that it supports the purpose of the Geneva 2 conference, it is hard to see how it can play a constructive role in finding a political solution to the conflict."

But one senior European Union diplomat said that after Sunday's deal with Tehran, "I cannot imagine Washington continuing to object to an Iranian presence."

Brahimi urged the warring parties to try to start taking the heat out of the conflict, for example by freeing prisoners. But asked whether he aimed for a ceasefire for the start of the talks, he said, "Being realistic, a lot of the things that need to happen will happen after the conference starts, not before."

He said he hoped both Syrian sides would name delegations before the end of the year. Assad, battling to extend a ruling dynasty established by his late father four decades ago, is expected to dispatch trusted aides to speak for him.

For the opposition, the task is complicated by disputes among rebels fighting on the ground, including hardline Islamists, and exile politicians backed by Western powers.

On Sunday, Brahimi met leaders of the Syrian National Coalition, the umbrella body that has been disowned by many rebel commanders. The U.N. envoy said on Monday that the SNC would play an important role in forming the delegation.

"But," he added, "I have always said that the delegation has to be credible and as representative as possible.

"This conference is really for the Syrians to come to Geneva to talk to one another and hopefully start a credible, workable, effective peace process for their country."

(Additional reporting by Tom Miles in Geneva, Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Paul Taylor and John Irish in Paris, Andrew Osborn in London, Arshad Mohammed, Lesley Wroughton, Matt Spetalnick and Mark Felsenthal in Washington, Jeff Mason aboard Air Force One and Michelle Nichols and Louis Charbonneau at the United Nations; Editing by Giles Elgood, Alastair Macdonald and Peter Cooney)

But a day after Assad's regional ally Iran cut a deal on its nuclear programme with the United States and other world powers to ease fears of a wider war in the Middle East, U.N. officials spoke of a chance to start staunching the bloodshed.

It remained unclear whether Iran would attend - nor is it clear who will represent the divided Syrian opposition - although U.S. officials raised doubts about Tehran's participation.

"There are many challenges ahead and no one should underestimate the difficulties," said a spokesman for U.S. President Barack Obama as he welcomed a date for the talks.

"The United States has long made clear that there is no military solution to the violence in Syria," he added.

Russia, a vital supplier to Syria, which has shielded Assad from Western demands for U.N. sanctions and from rebel demands that he step down before negotiations can start, again blamed the opposition for holding up the peace conference.

"It could have been held much earlier if the opposition had felt responsibility for its country and had not put forward preconditions when we met in September, October, November," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted as saying by state-run Russian news agency RIA.

'EYES WIDE OPEN'

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, fresh from a weekend working with Lavrov on the Iran nuclear deal at Geneva, said in a statement, "We are well aware that the obstacles on the road to a political solution are many, and we will enter the Geneva conference on Syria with our eyes wide open."

After so much blood has been spilled since demonstrations for democracy began during the Arab Spring, many on either side of Syria's divide see only outright victory guaranteeing their own survival. But neither side has delivered a knockout blow, giving mediators a chance to argue for compromise.

The deep engagement of neighbouring powers in the conflict, notably Shi'ite Iran behind Assad and Sunni Saudi Arabia behind the rebels, has also complicated efforts to defuse it.

Kerry and Brahimi said the presence of Iranian officials at the Syria conference - something Moscow supports and Washington has so far opposed - was yet to be decided.

But U.S. officials said Washington's position remained that Iran should not attend because it has not signed on to the "Geneva 1" framework. One of its core elements is that a future Syrian government must be formed by "mutual consent" of the authorities and the opposition, a stance the United States says means Assad cannot stay in power.

"We will continue to work in concert with the U.N. and our partners on remaining issues, including which countries will be invited to attend and what the agenda will be," Kerry said.

For Western governments, Iran's reluctance to endorse last year's international accord on Syria has been a bar to its attendance at talks widely referred to as "Geneva 2".

Ban described the aim of the new summit as the "full implementation of the Geneva communique of 30 June, 2012".

A spokeswoman for the British Foreign Office said, "Until Iran publicly endorses the Geneva communique, and therefore makes clear that it supports the purpose of the Geneva 2 conference, it is hard to see how it can play a constructive role in finding a political solution to the conflict."

But one senior European Union diplomat said that after Sunday's deal with Tehran, "I cannot imagine Washington continuing to object to an Iranian presence."

Brahimi urged the warring parties to try to start taking the heat out of the conflict, for example by freeing prisoners. But asked whether he aimed for a ceasefire for the start of the talks, he said, "Being realistic, a lot of the things that need to happen will happen after the conference starts, not before."

He said he hoped both Syrian sides would name delegations before the end of the year. Assad, battling to extend a ruling dynasty established by his late father four decades ago, is expected to dispatch trusted aides to speak for him.

For the opposition, the task is complicated by disputes among rebels fighting on the ground, including hardline Islamists, and exile politicians backed by Western powers.

On Sunday, Brahimi met leaders of the Syrian National Coalition, the umbrella body that has been disowned by many rebel commanders. The U.N. envoy said on Monday that the SNC would play an important role in forming the delegation.

"But," he added, "I have always said that the delegation has to be credible and as representative as possible.

"This conference is really for the Syrians to come to Geneva to talk to one another and hopefully start a credible, workable, effective peace process for their country."

(Additional reporting by Tom Miles in Geneva, Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Paul Taylor and John Irish in Paris, Andrew Osborn in London, Arshad Mohammed, Lesley Wroughton, Matt Spetalnick and Mark Felsenthal in Washington, Jeff Mason aboard Air Force One and Michelle Nichols and Louis Charbonneau at the United Nations; Editing by Giles Elgood, Alastair Macdonald and Peter Cooney)

But a day after Assad's regional ally Iran cut a deal on its nuclear programme with the United States and other world powers to ease fears of a wider war in the Middle East, U.N. officials spoke of a chance to start staunching the bloodshed.

It remained unclear whether Iran would attend - nor is it clear who will represent the divided Syrian opposition - although U.S. officials raised doubts about Tehran's participation.

"There are many challenges ahead and no one should underestimate the difficulties," said a spokesman for U.S. President Barack Obama as he welcomed a date for the talks.

"The United States has long made clear that there is no military solution to the violence in Syria," he added.

Russia, a vital supplier to Syria, which has shielded Assad from Western demands for U.N. sanctions and from rebel demands that he step down before negotiations can start, again blamed the opposition for holding up the peace conference.

"It could have been held much earlier if the opposition had felt responsibility for its country and had not put forward preconditions when we met in September, October, November," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted as saying by state-run Russian news agency RIA.

'EYES WIDE OPEN'

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, fresh from a weekend working with Lavrov on the Iran nuclear deal at Geneva, said in a statement, "We are well aware that the obstacles on the road to a political solution are many, and we will enter the Geneva conference on Syria with our eyes wide open."

After so much blood has been spilled since demonstrations for democracy began during the Arab Spring, many on either side of Syria's divide see only outright victory guaranteeing their own survival. But neither side has delivered a knockout blow, giving mediators a chance to argue for compromise.

The deep engagement of neighbouring powers in the conflict, notably Shi'ite Iran behind Assad and Sunni Saudi Arabia behind the rebels, has also complicated efforts to defuse it.

Kerry and Brahimi said the presence of Iranian officials at the Syria conference - something Moscow supports and Washington has so far opposed - was yet to be decided.

But U.S. officials said Washington's position remained that Iran should not attend because it has not signed on to the "Geneva 1" framework. One of its core elements is that a future Syrian government must be formed by "mutual consent" of the authorities and the opposition, a stance the United States says means Assad cannot stay in power.

"We will continue to work in concert with the U.N. and our partners on remaining issues, including which countries will be invited to attend and what the agenda will be," Kerry said.

For Western governments, Iran's reluctance to endorse last year's international accord on Syria has been a bar to its attendance at talks widely referred to as "Geneva 2".

Ban described the aim of the new summit as the "full implementation of the Geneva communique of 30 June, 2012".

A spokeswoman for the British Foreign Office said, "Until Iran publicly endorses the Geneva communique, and therefore makes clear that it supports the purpose of the Geneva 2 conference, it is hard to see how it can play a constructive role in finding a political solution to the conflict."

But one senior European Union diplomat said that after Sunday's deal with Tehran, "I cannot imagine Washington continuing to object to an Iranian presence."

Brahimi urged the warring parties to try to start taking the heat out of the conflict, for example by freeing prisoners. But asked whether he aimed for a ceasefire for the start of the talks, he said, "Being realistic, a lot of the things that need to happen will happen after the conference starts, not before."

He said he hoped both Syrian sides would name delegations before the end of the year. Assad, battling to extend a ruling dynasty established by his late father four decades ago, is expected to dispatch trusted aides to speak for him.

For the opposition, the task is complicated by disputes among rebels fighting on the ground, including hardline Islamists, and exile politicians backed by Western powers.

On Sunday, Brahimi met leaders of the Syrian National Coalition, the umbrella body that has been disowned by many rebel commanders. The U.N. envoy said on Monday that the SNC would play an important role in forming the delegation.

"But," he added, "I have always said that the delegation has to be credible and as representative as possible.

"This conference is really for the Syrians to come to Geneva to talk to one another and hopefully start a credible, workable, effective peace process for their country."

(Additional reporting by Tom Miles in Geneva, Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Paul Taylor and John Irish in Paris, Andrew Osborn in London, Arshad Mohammed, Lesley Wroughton, Matt Spetalnick and Mark Felsenthal in Washington, Jeff Mason aboard Air Force One and Michelle Nichols and Louis Charbonneau at the United Nations; Editing by Giles Elgood, Alastair Macdonald and Peter Cooney)

But a day after Assad's regional ally Iran cut a deal on its nuclear programme with the United States and other world powers to ease fears of a wider war in the Middle East, U.N. officials spoke of a chance to start staunching the bloodshed.

It remained unclear whether Iran would attend - nor is it clear who will represent the divided Syrian opposition - although U.S. officials raised doubts about Tehran's participation.

"There are many challenges ahead and no one should underestimate the difficulties," said a spokesman for U.S. President Barack Obama as he welcomed a date for the talks.

"The United States has long made clear that there is no military solution to the violence in Syria," he added.

Russia, a vital supplier to Syria, which has shielded Assad from Western demands for U.N. sanctions and from rebel demands that he step down before negotiations can start, again blamed the opposition for holding up the peace conference.

"It could have been held much earlier if the opposition had felt responsibility for its country and had not put forward preconditions when we met in September, October, November," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted as saying by state-run Russian news agency RIA.

'EYES WIDE OPEN'

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, fresh from a weekend working with Lavrov on the Iran nuclear deal at Geneva, said in a statement, "We are well aware that the obstacles on the road to a political solution are many, and we will enter the Geneva conference on Syria with our eyes wide open."

After so much blood has been spilled since demonstrations for democracy began during the Arab Spring, many on either side of Syria's divide see only outright victory guaranteeing their own survival. But neither side has delivered a knockout blow, giving mediators a chance to argue for compromise.

The deep engagement of neighbouring powers in the conflict, notably Shi'ite Iran behind Assad and Sunni Saudi Arabia behind the rebels, has also complicated efforts to defuse it.

Kerry and Brahimi said the presence of Iranian officials at the Syria conference - something Moscow supports and Washington has so far opposed - was yet to be decided.

But U.S. officials said Washington's position remained that Iran should not attend because it has not signed on to the "Geneva 1" framework. One of its core elements is that a future Syrian government must be formed by "mutual consent" of the authorities and the opposition, a stance the United States says means Assad cannot stay in power.

"We will continue to work in concert with the U.N. and our partners on remaining issues, including which countries will be invited to attend and what the agenda will be," Kerry said.

For Western governments, Iran's reluctance to endorse last year's international accord on Syria has been a bar to its attendance at talks widely referred to as "Geneva 2".

Ban described the aim of the new summit as the "full implementation of the Geneva communique of 30 June, 2012".

A spokeswoman for the British Foreign Office said, "Until Iran publicly endorses the Geneva communique, and therefore makes clear that it supports the purpose of the Geneva 2 conference, it is hard to see how it can play a constructive role in finding a political solution to the conflict."

But one senior European Union diplomat said that after Sunday's deal with Tehran, "I cannot imagine Washington continuing to object to an Iranian presence."

Brahimi urged the warring parties to try to start taking the heat out of the conflict, for example by freeing prisoners. But asked whether he aimed for a ceasefire for the start of the talks, he said, "Being realistic, a lot of the things that need to happen will happen after the conference starts, not before."

He said he hoped both Syrian sides would name delegations before the end of the year. Assad, battling to extend a ruling dynasty established by his late father four decades ago, is expected to dispatch trusted aides to speak for him.

For the opposition, the task is complicated by disputes among rebels fighting on the ground, including hardline Islamists, and exile politicians backed by Western powers.

On Sunday, Brahimi met leaders of the Syrian National Coalition, the umbrella body that has been disowned by many rebel commanders. The U.N. envoy said on Monday that the SNC would play an important role in forming the delegation.

"But," he added, "I have always said that the delegation has to be credible and as representative as possible.

"This conference is really for the Syrians to come to Geneva to talk to one another and hopefully start a credible, workable, effective peace process for their country."

(Additional reporting by Tom Miles in Geneva, Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Paul Taylor and John Irish in Paris, Andrew Osborn in London, Arshad Mohammed, Lesley Wroughton, Matt Spetalnick and Mark Felsenthal in Washington, Jeff Mason aboard Air Force One and Michelle Nichols and Louis Charbonneau at the United Nations; Editing by Giles Elgood, Alastair Macdonald and Peter Cooney)

...Stephanie Nebehay